For years, the idea that natural immunity could protect against COVID-19 was ridiculed, censored, and dismissed as "misinformation." Now, Dr. Paul Offit—one of America’s most prominent vaccine advocates—admits that the Biden administration never seriously considered natural infection as a valid alternative to vaccination. Why? Because of "bureaucratic concerns."

This bombshell revelation came from Offit himself in a video circulating on X (formerly Twitter) via The Chief Nerd where he acknowledged that natural immunity does protect against severe disease—a fact now backed by data. Yet, in the heat of vaccine mandates, Offit reveals that the White House simply did not want to deal with the hassle of verifying natural infection. Instead, millions of Americans were forced to comply, lose their jobs, or be cast out of society—all to avoid a "bureaucratic layer."

"Dr. Paul Offit Admits Natural Immunity Could Have Prevented COVID—Biden Admin Ignored It for Bureaucratic Concerns," discusses statements made by Dr. Paul Offit, a prominent vaccine expert and FDA advisory committee member. In an interview on the ZDoggMD podcast, Offit revealed that in early 2021, he participated in a meeting with top Biden administration health officials, including Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Vivek Murthy, and Francis Collins, to discuss whether natural immunity should exempt individuals from COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

Offit argued that natural infection provided robust protection against severe disease, comparable to vaccination, citing emerging data and the immune response involving memory B and T cells. He suggested that proving prior infection via antibody tests could have been a practical exemption method.

However, the administration rejected this approach, which Offit attributed to bureaucratic resistance rather than scientific reasoning, noting it was "just another layer that they didn’t want to consider." The article frames this as evidence of the Biden administration prioritizing policy uniformity over scientific evidence, potentially undermining public trust.

Offit’s comments are presented as a shift from his earlier pro-vaccine stance, highlighting a tension between natural immunity and mandated vaccination policies.

Dig In - TrialSiteNews.com